@movq Curious what you would define as "suck less" software? (language agnostic of course!)

@movq So you wouldn;t consider things written in Go to be "suckless"-esque? 🤔

@movq Yeah that's why I'm striking this conversation with you 😅 Not only do I respect your opinion quite highly 🤣 But like you say (and I've read their philipshpy) it can be a bit "elitism" for sure. I'm genuinely interested in what we think of as software that "doesn't suck". Tb be honest I haven't really put thought to paper myself, but I reckon if I did, I'd have some opinions/ideas...

For example, I reckon software should treat stdout and stderr with care and never output logs or other such garbage to stdout that cannot possibly be useful in a UNIX pipeline 😅

@movq This is a really good example of "simplicity" but achieves the intent and goals 👌

(Now, I don’t know if your screen reader can work with this. Let me know if it doesn’t.)

I don't use a screen reader fortunately (actually they're pretty garbage). So all good 👍 (I juse use full-screen zoom).