blog.ratterobert.com

Conversation

Recent posts in reply to #4kymicq

bender (twtxt.net)

@andros nothing stands still, I agree. I think current twtxt has surpassed the initial specification, while still being relatively backwards compliant/compatible but, for how long?

As for new extensions (DM, for example), they should be OK as long as those working on clients can reach an agreement on how to move forward. That has proven, though, to be a pickle in the past.

In reply to: #y265kba 2 months ago
prologic (twtxt.net)

@bender You said:

as long as those working on clients can reach an agreement on how to move forward. That has proven, though, to be a pickle in the past.

I think this is because we probably need to start thinking about three different aspects to the ecosystem and document them out:

  • Specifications (as they are now)
  • Server recommendations (e.g: Timeline, yarnd, etc)
  • Client recommendations (e.g: jenny, tt, tt2, twet, etc)
In reply to: #4kymicq 2 months ago
Reply via email