blog.ratterobert.com

movq (www.uninformativ.de)

@zvava

(<a href="?search=abcdefghijkl" class="tag">#abcdefghijkl</a> https://example.com/tw.txt#:~:text=2025-10-01T10:28:00Z), because it can be simply hacked in to clients currently on hashv1 and provides an off-ramp to location-based addressing

I like that property (an off-ramp to location-based addressing), so I think I could live with that approach. ✅

(I’m not sure why we’re using text fragments, though. Wouldn’t that link to the first occurence of 2025-10-01T10:28:00Z? That’s not necessarily correct. And, to be proper URLs that Firefox and Chromium understand, it would also need to be written as 2025%2D10%2D01T10:28:00Z. [The dash carries meaning](https://wicg.github.io/scroll-to-text-fragment/#context-terms), sadly. I think all this just creates needless complication. How about we just go with https://example.com/tw.txt#2025-10-01T10:28:00Z?)

In reply to: #xrswtvq 1 week ago
Reply via email